Indian Officer » General Studies » India and the World » 'International treaty doesn't allow Australia to sell uranium to India'

India and the World Foreign Affairs, External Security and related matters, Nuclear Policy etc. (Paper II)

Reply
Old 08-29-2007   #1
 
Sreekar's Avatar
 
Status: Home away from Home
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: India
Posts: 614
Nominated 1 Time in 1 Post
Nominated TOTW/F/M Award(s): 1
Post 'International treaty doesn't allow Australia to sell uranium to India'

'International treaty doesn't allow Australia to sell uranium to India'

Australia will be in breach of an international anti-nuclear treaty as well as specific undertakings given by its Foreign Minister if the government goes ahead with plans to sell uranium to India, the world's largest NGO working against nuclear proliferation has claimed.

Experts from the James Martin Centre for Non-Proliferation Studies (CNS) at the Monterey Institute of International studies in California have seized on a statement made by Foreign Minister Alexander Downer ten years ago, in which he said Australia could only sell uranium to countries that had signed up to "full scope safeguards" on their nuclear plants, according to a report published in The Age .

According to the NGO, the proposed sales to India will be subject to a regime that falls well short of "full scope safeguards".

Under a draft US-India deal, without which Australian sales to India would not go ahead, only civil nuclear plants will be subject to inspection, while military installations will not.

Experts from CNS said Australia will be in breach of the South Pacific Nuclear Free Treaty, signed in the 1980s, and point to an answer Downer gave ten years ago to a parliamentary question on notice as proof.

The South Pacific treaty, which came in the wake of testing in the Pacific by France, toughened Australia's stance on the level of safeguards required for exporting uranium.

As Downer said in 1996: "Article 4 (a) of the South Pacific Nuclear Free Zone Treaty imposes a legal obligation not to provide nuclear material unless subject to the safeguards required by Article III.1 of the NPT (nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty), that is full scope safeguards."

Critics say the absence of inspection requirements for non-civil reactors in India means all material from them would potentially be available for weapons, increasing the risk of proliferation of material such as plutonium used in weapons.

Monterey Institute's Washington director, Leonard Spector, said Australia was trying to find "wriggle-room" so it could proceed with the uranium sales. "The question of whether Australia can legally export uranium to India is no longer in doubt. It cannot."

A spokesman for Downer said the minister was confident there was no breach of South Pacific treaty obligations.

He said the proposed India deal had a number of safeguards including those within the US-India agreement, an International Atomic Energy Agency inspection regime, a sign-off from the suppliers group and other safeguards in the supply contract.

Labour's spokesman on foreign affairs, Rob McClelland, said the more uranium is exported to a country sitting outside the non-proliferation regime, the greater the risk of nuclear material falling into the wrong hands. "This is why Labour does not support the sale of uranium to a non signatory to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty," he said.

Greens spokeswoman on nuclear issues, Senator Christine Milne said, "Australia has become an international rogue, undermining multilateralism and treaties we have taken a lead in, whether it be on nuclear non-proliferation, the Pacific or on climate change."

(**Source:TimesofIndia.com)
-Thanks much,
Sreekar
Sreekar is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Share on FacebookGoogle Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Stumble this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Sreekar For This Useful Post:
Jaya D (01-05-2008), latheefpashask (10-31-2007)

Sponsored Links
Reply

Tags
australia, nuclear, uranium


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Answers For G.S. Prelims 2007 ... Nethra K Putti Prelims General Discussions 34 10-26-2007 08:05 PM
days of the year drarulrbk International Affairs Wiki 4 06-16-2007 01:10 PM
G. S. Prelims 2004 with Ans. sunilware Prelims General Discussions 0 10-11-2006 01:01 PM



All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 10:50 AM.
vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Powered by NuWiki v1.3 RC1 Copyright ©2006-2007, NuHit, LLC Web Technologies by Dr. Kushal Pathak




1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106