Discussions: Test Indian officer Live Chat

[kushal]

This is the discussion thread for the Announcement here!
Kindly use this thread to Post any bug, suggestion, or comment about the announcement.

Do not use this thread for any other purpose than defined above.

Regards,
Kushal

[chocochipp_in]

This is a great idea, esp. for live interaction with the officers. Thank You very much!
Sir, if its possible, it would be very helpful if we get an idea when an officer is going to be online, so that we can login at the same time. Of course, only if it is convinient to everyone.

[kushal]

That is a good suggestion, and in fact our idea is what you just stated.
Once you guys test the live chat sessions and give us more of feedback, the job would be rewarding for us.

[Latha Ramesh]

Kushal Sir,

This is a Great idea!!! Thank you
The Look and feel of the chat window is nice. I have a doubt, whether all the chat sessions are going to be stored in the server and available for viewing later?

[chocochipp_in]

Yes, its working absolutely fine. Storing of chat would be helpful for those who miss the sessions and for reference.

[kushal]

<table border="1"><tbody><tr><td>475</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:23:49</td> <td> Nethra K Putti </td> <td>hellow sir ...</td> </tr> <tr> <td>476</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:24:34</td> <td> Nethra K Putti </td> <td>can i have few tips for</td> </tr> <tr> <td>477</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:24:42</td> <td> Nethra K Putti </td> <td>Psycho</td> </tr> <tr> <td>478</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:24:46</td> <td> kushal </td> <td>There is no negative marking for Mains in Psychology, diagrams are not compulsory, quoting important thinkers especially for the Paper II is a good bet</td> </tr> <tr> <td>479</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:25:05</td> <td> Nethra K Putti </td> <td>thanzxs sir</td> </tr> <tr> <td>480</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:25:29</td> <td> Nethra K Putti </td> <td>i was afriad that there is negetive marking .. now im better relaxed</td> </tr> <tr> <td>481</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:25:42</td> <td> kushal </td> <td>Scoring in paper II is a challenge, and who get that would reach 360+</td> </tr> <tr> <td>482</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:26:09</td> <td> Nethra K Putti </td> <td>for paper 1 does thinker's quotes r not neccessary u tell</td> </tr> <tr> <td>483</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:26:27</td> <td> Nethra K Putti </td> <td>& how much i should score in paper 1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>484</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:27:16</td> <td> kushal </td> <td>well Paper I is more of theory, and hence more of conceptual thing. and mastering it is a must. Quote are generally required when you are interpreting an answer like you need to do in Paper II</td> </tr> <tr> <td>485</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:27:48</td> <td> Nethra K Putti </td> <td>ok sir thanks</td> </tr> <tr> <td>486</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:27:51</td> <td> kushal </td> <td>Paper I you should aim for 180 to 190</td> </tr> <tr> <td>487</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:28:09</td> <td> Nethra K Putti </td> <td>ok fine !!</td> </tr> <tr> <td>488</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:28:30</td> <td> kushal </td> <td>if you can score 160 plus in Paper II you are through </td> </tr> <tr> <td>489</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:29:40</td> <td> Nethra K Putti </td> <td>but the paper is for 600 marks .. paper 1 is 300 & paper 2 is 300 .. but my question is .. in paper 1 u told that 180 to get .. is this wont be fail marks</td> </tr> <tr> <td>490</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:29:46</td> <td> Nethra K Putti </td> <td>in paper 1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>491</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:30:20</td> <td> kushal </td> <td>sorry I meant 380 390</td> </tr> <tr> <td>492</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:30:30</td> <td> kushal </td> <td>and 360 in paper II</td> </tr> <tr> <td>493</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:30:42</td> <td> Nethra K Putti </td> <td>ok sir .. thaz what i was looking .. for</td> </tr> <tr> <td>494</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:31:06</td> <td> Nethra K Putti </td> <td>then tell me that for totally out of 600 how much i should score..</td> </tr> <tr> <td>495</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:31:15</td> <td> Nethra K Putti </td> <td>is there any target marks to be taken</td> </tr> <tr> <td>496</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:31:17</td> <td> Nethra K Putti </td> <td>?</td> </tr> <tr> <td>497</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:32:29</td> <td> Nethra K Putti </td> <td>how come 360 in paper 2 its only 300 marks .. how did is possible sir .. im totally in confused</td> </tr> <tr> <td>498</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:33:16</td> <td> Nethra K Putti </td> <td>first u better mention that how much marks is for paper 1 & paper 2 ..</td> </tr> <tr> <td>499</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:33:23</td> <td> Nethra K Putti </td> <td>sir</td> </tr> <tr> <td>500</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:33:57</td> <td> kushal </td> <td>let me put is again, paper I 190/300 paper II 160/300 total around 350/400</td> </tr> <tr> <td>501</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:34:41</td> <td> Nethra K Putti </td> <td>wat is this .. for 400 marks a ...</td> </tr> <tr> <td>502</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:34:55</td> <td> Nethra K Putti </td> <td>u r mentione about paper 1 sec a b</td> </tr> <tr> <td>503</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:35:24</td> <td> kushal </td> <td>I am doing lot of multi tasking right now, so missed the numbers. 350-360 is a good number in psychology, if your other optional are equally good</td> </tr> <tr> <td>504</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:36:11</td> <td> Nethra K Putti </td> <td>my other optinal is Public administration & Psychology for mains ..</td> </tr> <tr> <td>505</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:36:37</td> <td> kushal </td> <td>pub Ad will require another 350+</td> </tr> <tr> <td>506</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:36:42</td> <td> Nethra K Putti </td> <td>P.A. for prelims</td> </tr> <tr> <td>507</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:37:00</td> <td> kushal </td> <td>that is a better bet than psychology</td> </tr> <tr> <td>508</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:37:01</td> <td> Nethra K Putti </td> <td>there is no problem for me in p.a.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>509</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:37:06</td> <td> kushal </td> <td>good choice</td> </tr> <tr> <td>510</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:37:19</td> <td> Nethra K Putti </td> <td>i can score lots more .. sir</td> </tr> <tr> <td>511</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:37:32</td> <td> kushal </td> <td>that is much better</td> </tr> <tr> <td>512</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:37:55</td> <td> Nethra K Putti </td> <td>because the 3/4 of the chapter s in P.a mains i have studied in my B.Com itself ..</td> </tr> <tr> <td>513</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:38:23</td> <td> Nethra K Putti </td> <td>since for me Psycho is new subject i have lots of doubts</td> </tr> <tr> <td>514</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:38:30</td> <td> kushal </td> <td>A safe under 20 topper list would require: Optional I 360 optional II 360, GS 375, Essay 120</td> </tr> <tr> <td>515</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:38:57</td> <td> Nethra K Putti </td> <td>thanzxs sir</td> </tr> <tr> <td>516</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:39:01</td> <td> Nethra K Putti </td> <td>another que ..</td> </tr> <tr> <td>517</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:39:06</td> <td> kushal </td> <td>I got to go for a party today, so would leave you now. have a great day</td> </tr> <tr> <td>518</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:39:17</td> <td> kushal </td> <td>can we discuss some other time ?</td> </tr> <tr> <td>519</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:39:31</td> <td> Nethra K Putti </td> <td>ok sir thanzxs so much for solving my subject problems ..</td> </tr> <tr> <td>520</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:39:43</td> <td> Nethra K Putti </td> <td>i will ask lots more que next time</td> </tr> <tr> <td>521</td> <td>Mar 11, 2007 05:39:53</td> <td> kushal </td> <td>sure</td></tr></tbody></table>

[kushal]

This is an example of the chat session. How do you like the format?

@latha
We would selectively publish the chat session over forums for viewing and discussions, and the whole chat sessions would not be made public.

Also we have now Officer's Session, which will be completely official and only professional chat would be allowed. This way we would have an easy filtering and would save our time in publishing the content of chat session over forums. However, the Officer's session would be password protected. Once the session is called of, the password would be circulated to those via Email or via forums who are interested in joining the session. As of now the 'officer's Session' is password protected and for those who want to see how to enter the 'Officer's session', use this password 'indianofficer.com'

[Latha Ramesh]

Kushal Sir,

This format is Good, clear and simple. Also, the chat sessions can be named - about the topic people are discussing. For ex. "Scoring in psychology mains" can be the topic for the chat pasted below. Just by viewing the topic and the chat, we shall clear our doubts. We may not ask the same question again to the same officer. This way i think we can effectively use this Chat sessions. But, this would add up more work for the moderators

[kushal]

That is a a good suggestion to name and categorize the chat sessions. My idea would be to post a pre-declared chat sessions especially from 'officers' Sessions' as I have told in my previous posts, there by saving time to select important chat sessions.

And thank you Latha for the feedback about chat sessions. I am pretty excited about these new codes and I foresee a good utilization in future.

[ganeshvs71]

This is nice indeed. One really feels that he is in a lounge. very relaxing and soothing. Well done kushal.